Saturday, July 30, 2011

Order out of Chaos II

Observe life and recognize that it exhibits the trait of transformation above all others. It does so by design. But why?

The mere fact that all elements represent a state of order, can allow one to assume that this order had emerged from an unordered state, or a different composition of equal or lesser complexity.
All structures that consist of such elements represent an order at the next higher level. This higher order again emerged from an unordered state of equal or lesser complexity.
Continuing this method, this process, it is not difficult to assume that in our stage this method is still the major paradigm. What ever becomes of that, which may be achieve THROUGH US, will represent a new order. But not the "New World Order". To provide order for the ordering system may well corrupt the process that we are designed for to achieve.
In all likelihood it is our mission to adhere to the guiding mechanisms in our "Spirit". Those are not defined by man, but only experienced. Any definition provided by man, corrupts or confuses sincerity as we no longer are inspired to trust our own judgement for a purpose beyond the self of mankind, but are asked to deny the truth we would know to embrace and instead submit ourselves to imposed necessities, enslaving our physical self and imprison our spiritual self. It is in that spiritual element, our true mind, where we give direction to our physical self, but also where we receive direction from the highest ordering aspiration, so to say.

Whether you believe in god, godhead, infinity, the beyond or fundamental science, the direction and method of existence in all levels can be recognized coarsely as a development of order out of chaos. Through the imperative of transformation one can recognize that stagnation only maintains chaos. Equally it is possible to conclude that we have no right or proper capacity to decide to reduce any components under any arrogant assumption that any one of us would know better than the mechanism provided to all of us. You can't solve a puzzle by destroying any piece of it, really, let a lone 90% of it.
If a castle would build itself, would it destroy almost all the stones that were perfectly cut out for it only to become one single little tower with one window and no gate?

Maybe that's a dumb example, but well... it's all just thoughts.

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Meditation - defiance of lower dimensions...

A brief thought about meditation makes it appear to me, as if it was an attempt to defy the imperative of lower dimensions, which build-up ours. For example, one style of meditation asks a yogi to reverse his breathing, sacrificing one direction of the breath to the opposing one, down to up, up to down. In that he tries to experience and control the automation of his existence, which are apparently dictated by the laws introduced through the lower dimensions. This way he may sacrifice willingly submission to the fundamentals with a conscious alteration in favor of the next higher dimension, showing his awareness of what comes after or above himself.

In some ways the conscious renouncement of activity as it may be expected of him outside of his awareness, signalizes his devotion and his active participation in submission to the higher.

I believe this could well make an excellent call for help, but should be handled with great caution as it was highly presumptuous to claim a useful deed to the higher by defying the lower. It should be made clear, that all meditation of that kind is a selfish matter, even if the outcome may provide improvement to ones activity in awareness of the higher and all that is connected and all that are connected to it.

Just a thought, really.

Monday, July 11, 2011

Doubt and fresh air

I believe, the most hopeful thinker has both conviction and doubt. After all, doubt is part of what gets us to wonder. To deny the existence of doubt is the same denial one would accuse another of having, when it comes to science or religion. It should never be destructive or limiting, this doubt, but it's no crime to experience it or reason to dwell in confusion. It's a great help to revisit one's ideas or revelations, refine it all, find strength or realize that strength is not stubbornness, but the ability to openly experience the world of our senses as well as the content it offers to inspire our thoughts.
It should always be a sincere experience to understand. As such it should always remind us of the humility it requires to be sincere and that it doesn't elevate us above anyone, who thinks differently, but offers us a distinct awareness towards the sincerity of others or a lack thereof, if that's the case.
I personally qualify the opinion of somebody else by its authenticity. Does this person simply seek comfort in an offered explanation, adhering to suggestions of others as opposed to deducing by himself. This is not an easy task, actually, but I see a hint, when people become particularly aggressive in defending a specific point of view. When they openly- or not- attack another opinion as opposed to offering their own, for example, or even chose to attack the other person with labels or other inappropriate humiliations. And as soon as you speak clearly for either side, religion or science, you enter into our greatest spiritual conflict and confusion.

In my eyes, it's only our lack of understanding that makes a distinction between the original meaning of religion and science. For all the right reasons they have always gone hand in hand. Only when people started to use religion or science to justify aggressive actions, be it territorial or by imposition of their own system of society, both paradigms become questionable and the truth behind them loses relevance in discussions.

I'm firmly convinced that those devices are used against people and against life itself in our world today and probably for the longest time already. The moment we elevated association to a source of power, forming nations and claiming superiority, claiming rights and enforcing submission of their subjects, we've provided reason to deny doubt and denial itself. Because recognizing any of those would endanger the fragile structure of the deceitful empires.

Invite doubt again and take it in as a breeze of fresh air, because it teaches you about all the reasons to recognize humility as a device to connect and respect each other, regardless as to where we come from. We have no means to claim certainty over any of our observations, because we receive it all from our specific place within existence, even if we believe to have penetrated into other layers of it, our deduction itself takes place upon our slither in the spectrum of infinity.